The confused path of the Australian corporate tax residence rules: is reform necessary?
Published Date: 22 Apr 2024
In 2020, the Board of Taxation submitted to the government a series of recommendations to reformulate the Australian corporate tax residence rules. The Coalition government proposed the the adoption of the main recommendations, but whether the current Labor government will implement the proposal remains uncertain. Considering several inconsistent reform options offered in Australian tax history, it is important to set out a primary goal for amending the corporate residence rules, if any. This article provides a survey of the operation of the corporate tax residence rules from the time that residence taxation was formalised in 1930 until now, including the latest High Court case in Bywater Investments Ltd v FCT, finding historical merit in the rules used as an instrument for source taxation. Australian courts have consistently applied the common law principle that assigns residence by reference to the superior authority or power to control a company’s affairs, whereas various reform options have been suggested to provide definitional certainty in applying the central management and control test. Borrowing Marian’s functional approach to examine the residence rules against the prevention of profit shifting and base erosion in source taxation, this article argues that the existing law is operating as intended.
The only justifiable modification may be to provide that companies will no longer be Australian residents by reason of having their voting power controlled by Australian shareholders. This test has been used in a limited sense and appears to serve no apparent function.
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
- Published By: Christina Allen
- Published On:22 Apr 2024
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
Copyright Statement
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags
Share this page