This paper covers:
- Everett's case
- Kelly's case
- since Everett
- the guidelines
- practical considerations.
Source: Victoria
Published Date: 17 Jul 2018
This paper covers:
More by Keith Kendall
Everett assignments and the Commissioner's professional practice guidelines - Presentation 17 Jul 2018
Effective disclaimers - Journal 01 Feb 2018
Whose sham to prove? - Millar in the Full Federal Court - Journal 01 Sep 2016
The US tax adviser's privilege: Insights for Australia - Journal 01 Oct 2010
The SBT and agency law " is tax law an island? - Journal 01 Dec 2008
FCT v Citylink Melbourne Ltd - When is expenditure incurred? - Journal 01 Oct 2006
Black hole expenditure - Journal 01 Jul 2006
The structural approach to tax avoidance in Australia - Journal 01 Jun 2006
TR 2005/23 - capital and revenue gains for listed investment companies - Journal 01 Mar 2006
Individual Session
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags