2004

Recent developments in stamp duty - your duty to comply

Source: Victoria

Published Date: 19 Aug 2004

 
On 16 June 2004 the new State Taxation Acts (Tax Reform) Act came into effect, introducing a number of stamp duty changes, some of which were made retrospective to 13 May 2004. The Act is far reaching, covering rules and new provisions that:
- clarify the circumstances where duty is payable for the sale of land and business goods used in connection with a business
- introduce new anti-avoidance provisions to deter artificial and contrived schemes
- introduce revised tests for land-rich transactions
- increase the powers of the Commissioner to obtain valuations from taxpayers relating to dutiable property.

The changes also place greater onus on advisers and could make you liable for a penalty if incorrect information is provided to the SRO, even if that information is provided by third parties for whom you are not acting.

The New Victorian Land Rich Provisions

Author(s): Zoe Chung CTA

Duty implications of sale of business with land or fixtures

Author(s): Derek White

Stamp Duty: some recent developments

Author(s): Michael Bearman CTA

Administration of the State Taxation Acts (Tax Reform) Act

Author(s): David Ogilvie

Details

  • Published On:19 Aug 2004
  • Took place at:Leonda by the Yarra, Hawthorn

The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study,

research critisism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be rerpoduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

This material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study., research, critisism or review, as permitted under teh copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.

Unless expressly stated, opininons are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Tags

2004

Share this page