Source: Taxation In Australia Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Nov 2012
Under s 284-75(2) of Sch 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), a taxpayer is liable to an administrative penalty if, in a statement to the Commissioner, the taxpayer has treated an income tax law as applying to a matter in a particular way that was not “reasonably arguable”. The expression “reasonably arguable” formerly appeared in s 226K of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth). In a 2003 case, Walstern v FCT, Hill J expounded a number of propositions about the correct approach to penalty under the former s 226. Those principles have been applied in a number of decisions of the Full Court of the Federal Court without reservation until recently.
This article considers whether and, if so, to what extent, the observations in those cases have modified the Hill J formulation and introduced a lower standard as the test for what constitutes a reasonably arguable position.
More by Chris C Branson
ANZ Bank required to hand over Vanuatu information - Journal 01 Jun 2012
Reportable tax positions: A recent innovation by the ATO - Journal 01 Feb 2012
Accountants' privilege, access powers, and the Stewart and Denlay decisions - Journal 01 Aug 2011
Misunderstanding the nature of Propend privilege - Journal 01 Oct 2009
Waiver of legal professional privilege - ATO's access and information gathering powers - Paper 28 May 2008
Waiver of legal professional privilege - ATO's access and information gathering powers - Presentation 28 May 2008
McNeil's case: Was there any money in the pocket? - Journal 01 Oct 2007
Hart's Case: What may constitute a scheme - Journal 01 Dec 2004
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags