Tax Case: Mind your Ps and Qs with trusts
Source: Taxation In Australia Journal Article
Published Date: 1 May 2005
On 16 March 2005, Justice Spender of the Federal Court of Australia handed down the decision of Pearson v Commissioner of Taxation. This judgment considers the operation of Div 6 in circumstances where the net income of a trust is increased after the conclusion of an income year. This is another in a series of cases where the ATO has delved in detail into the terms and procedures of trusts deeds to determine tax liabilities in relation to trust income, much to the alarm of the taxpayer.
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
- Published By: Stephen Banfield
- Published On:1 May 2005
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
Copyright Statement
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags
Share this page