'Under pressure'? Section 39 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law and the Federal Commissioner of Taxation
Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Jul 2022
Taxation and legal professional privilege have a long history. (Indeed, it appears that one of the earliest cases to involve a claim of the privilege, Berd v Lovelace [1577] Cary 62, arose in a tax context.) Of late, however, the Australian Taxation Office (the ATO) has been bellicose in its opposition to claims of legal professional privilege. The ATO insists that legal practitioners who, in its view, make unfounded privilege claims leave themselves open to sanction for breaching their obligation to comply with the Federal Commissioner of Taxation's (the Commissioner's) coercive information-gathering powers (which, the ATO accepts, are subject to legal professional privilege).
What seems to have not quite received the same attention, though, are some of the prohibitions that might constrain the ATO itself in the exercise of its powers in this regard. Relevantly, s 39 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law provides that: 'A person must not cause or induce or attempt to cause or induce a law practice or a legal practitioner associate of a law practice to contravene this Law, the Uniform Rules or other professional obligations'.
This article discusses the potential relevance of s 39 (and its equivalents in Australian jurisdictions that have not adopted the Uniform Law) to the Commissioner and to agents or officers of the Commissioner. While pursuing the hardly objectionable objective that the legally 'correct' amount of tax be paid, it would appear that well-meaning but overzealous ATO officers could potentially expose themselves to criminal culpability if they seek to pressure practitioners in relation to claims of legal professional privilege, contrary to s 39 and its equivalents.
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
- Published By: Eu Jin Teo
- Published On:1 Jul 2022
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
Copyright Statement
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags
Share this page