Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Sep 2014
Dealing with the fiscal impacts of Australia’s ageing population is potentially the most important issue for the next 30 years. The majority of countries in the developed world are facing an ageing population due to sustained low fertility and increased life expectancy. In order to reduce the fiscal burden following this decreased labour force participation and increased age-related spending, governments must appropriately design retirement savings systems to protect their budget, the taxpayers and the elderly. Individuals are increasingly taking up employment in foreign countries. Such international labour mobility provides a number of economic benefits for both the home and host country and may assist in stimulating the economy in light of an ageing population. Despite the internationalisation of labour, there is no consensus or uniformity regarding a model of retirement taxation.
Australia’s model of retirement taxation is unique in the world, sitting as an outlier in comparison with other Organisation of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) nations. As a result of mobile retirees and workers, and with a variety of incongruous models of retirement taxation, the retirement taxation systems of the world present major problems in allocating the right to tax. Expatriate employees will often find themselves subject to double taxation on portions of their retirement funds or subject to harsh penalties for the transfer of their retirement benefits and the home or host state will often lose its right to tax. The aim of this paper is to identify a number of problems that a globally mobile work force presents to the current state of retirement fund taxation, especially from an Australian perspective. The paper will also provide a number of recommendations for reform in this area of law.
More by Rhys Cormick
Member profile: Rhys Cormick - Journal 01 Nov 2019
Dividend imputation: A critical review of the future of the system - Journal 01 Apr 2018
Digging up the dirt on the minerals resource rent tax constitutional challenge - Journal 01 Apr 2013
Strategies for satisfying the Australian residency tests for SMSFs - Journal 01 Nov 2012
More by John Mclaren
Dividend imputation: A critical review of the future of the system - Journal 01 Apr 2018
A uniform land tax in Australia: What is the potential for this to be a reality post the Henry Tax Review'? - Journal 01 Apr 2014
The OECD's harmful tax competition' project: Is it international tax law? - Journal 01 Oct 2009
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags