Source: Australian Tax Forum Journal Article
Published Date: 1 Apr 2012
The highly controversial and often politicised issue of Australia’s retirement savings regime featured prominently throughout the two day Federal Government’s October 2011 Tax Forum. Calls for reform of this regime are by no means new. Reform debate over the years has focused on each of the three separate pillars: the age pension, compulsory superannuation, and voluntary saving, as well as the interaction of those three elements. However, recently there has been a significant shift away from reliance on the age pension, with its associated risks falling to the government, to a defined contributions scheme where the associated risks fall to the individual taxpayer.Consequently, Australia’s superannuation regime is predominantly subject to current debate, and, as such, the subject of this article.
This article considers the history of Australia’s retirement savings regime, along with a framework for evaluating the superannuation tax concessions. It then discusses the recommendations of the Australian Future Tax System (AFTS) Review Panel and ensuing debate at the Tax Forum. Finally, it suggests two proposals to achieve the objectives of the AFTS Review in relation to retirement, those objectives being a system which is broad and adequate, acceptable to individuals, robust, simple and approachable, and finally sustainable. The first, whilst potentially requiring some ‘tinkering’, is relatively simple and a blue print has already been provided to the Federal Government – the adoption of Recommendations 18 and 19 of the AFTS Review.
The second is one of management. Superannuation concessions are fundamentally categorised as tax expenditures and the management of these tax expenditures, not just the reporting, should be undertaken.
More by Kerrie Sadiq
Identifying tax aggressive behaviour: testing the proxies - Journal 01 Apr 2022
The effectiveness of voluntary corporate tax disclosures: an Australian case study - Journal 01 Dec 2021
How can women contribute to the solution - Video 22 Nov 2017
Developing countries and the automatic exchange of information standard - a one-size-fits all solution? - Journal 01 Apr 2016
Is your client's product destined to sail the seven seas? - Paper 23 May 2013
Tax reform - A plan for the future (editorial) - Journal 01 Apr 2012
Incentivising private health insurance through the income tax regime: Capitalising on behavioural models - Journal 01 Dec 2011
Tax concessions for charities: competitive neutrality, the tax base and public goods choice - Journal 01 Dec 2010
The implementation of social and economic policy through the tax regime: a review of Australia's tax expenditures program - Journal 01 Dec 2008
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags