Source: Australian Tax Research Foundation
Published Date: 1 Jan 2003
This study explores the impact of complexity upon unintentional non-compliance behaviour for personal taxpayers in Australia. While compliance behaviour has been a topic of considerable research internationally over the last three decades or so, attention has generally been focused on intentional compliance behaviour, and in particular, on tax evasion and the processes by which taxpayers form their intentions.
In contrast, unintentional noncompliance as an area of study has largely been ignored both overseas and in Australia. This is in spite of the apparent potential it offers for tax authorities seeking to achieve improvements in compliance.
These taxpayers have formed the intention to comply, but perhaps because of the complexity of the system itself, the outcome was not as they intended. It seems reasonable to expect that the tax authority would seek to remove or address such impediments to compliance where they were within its control or influence, and take advantage of all well intended taxpayers. This study notes that for tax authorities, action designed to address unintentional non-compliance behaviour by personal taxpayers may be both more timely and more effective in achieving improvements in compliance than developing and implementing strategies to either change taxpayers’ attitudes or to limit opportunities for tax evasion.
More by Margaret Mckerchar
Tax aware investment management by public offer superannuation funds in Australia: Attitudes, practices and expectations - Journal 01 May 2014
The impact of managing tax risk on the tax compliance behaviour of large Australian companies - Journal 01 Dec 2013
Historical perspectives on the emergence of the tax profession: Australia and the UK - Journal 01 Jul 2013
Achieving innovation and global competitiveness through research and development tax incentives: Lessons for Australia from the UK - Journal 01 Feb 2012
Understanding Australian small businesses and the drivers of compliance costs: a grounded theory approach - Journal 01 Jul 2009
Fostering green innovation: can Australia's research and development tax concession be more effective? - Journal 01 Feb 2009
Improving the quality of services offered by tax agents: can regulation assist? - Journal 01 Dec 2008
Is there a perception of revenue bias on the part of the ATO in private binding rulings on large, complex issues? - Journal 01 Sep 2008
Is the simplified tax system simple? - Journal 01 Feb 2007
An international comparative analysis of self assessment: What lessons are there for tax administrators? - Journal 01 Oct 2005
Sorry, this is subscriber only content.
To gain access to this material and much more - Subscribe Now.
(Note: Members can access Taxation in Australia journal articles without a Tax Knowledge Exchange subscription - please log in to access).
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Already a Subscriber? Login now
Details
The material is copyright. Apart any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research criticism or review, as permitted under the copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.
The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))
("TTI")
The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.
All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.
Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.
Tags